![]() After that, price goes way up for more effective bullets.ħ.62- I would say Golden Tiger, or anything in spam cans. Probably better off sticking with xm193 and some xm855/ss-109. Not much of a price difference so why not. A Little more expensive, but a chance to gain diameter.ĥ.56- Stick with 5.56 pressure over 223. Either that or maybe standard 147gr FMJ cause they have a flat nose.Ĥ5acp- Older Federal HP's should be similar to my 9mm opinion. Almost the price of FMJ and a pretty good chance they might get bigger in diameter. Tests have shown that they don't open all the time, but who cares. ![]() the cheaper the better.ĩmm- For just a little more than FMJ you can get Hi-shoks (comparing to similar manufactures of course). 22's- Whatever runs the best in your gun. I'm thinking of reloading 5k 5.56 with 69 grain noslers, I think that would be pretty ideal cost vs effect downrange Even if they are degraded and lost 10% velocity they will still do the job. I think any 7.62X54R or 7.62X51 is going to do the job so those are pretty viable, especially buying spam cans. I can't think of any way to affordably buy 9mm/.40/.380 ammo that is relatively effective at killing people. I assume there is some fairly decent bulk 7.62X39 and 5.45 out there point me in the right direction. Can you buy buckshot by the case at an affordable rate? How about slugs?ĪK guys if you wanted to stockpile 5k+ rounds for the end of the world what would you stockpile. M855/green tips 62 grain steel core 5.56 water sealed, high velocity to keep the rifle cycling even in non-ideal situations.īird shot for shotguns for food and cut shells. 45 acp 230 grain FMJ, its very lethal, and your not paying for defense loads. Labour's shadow defence secretary John Healey said: "Our military stockpiles are depleted and the Government is acting too slowly to replenish them.Seriously was thinking about this today seeing the other similar thread.Ĭheap bulk. "We remain fully engaged with industry, allies and partners to ensure both the continuation of supply to Ukraine and replenishment of UK stock as quickly as possible," a statement added. "A powerful, resilient armed forces, standing shoulder to shoulder with our allies overseas, is the best deterrent against aggression."Ī Ministry of Defence spokesman said it was continuing to "place orders to replace ammunition given to Ukraine and (we) have an extra £560m to increase stockpiles". Safety, security and democracy are hard won and easily lost. "We, therefore, recommend that the department produce an action plan of how it intends to grow defence industrial capacity and reduce the time taken to replenish UK stockpiles."Ĭommittee chairman Tobias Ellwood said: "Russia's invasion of Ukraine should be a wake-up call for the West. "The MOD produced a strategy aimed at improving the way that it engages with industry and allies almost two years ago and yet we have been told it will take at least a decade to replenish (and then increase to a sustainable level) UK ammunition stockpiles," it said. The committee said it was essential that the UK's defence industrial capacity was both "resilient and scalable" if it was to be able to ramp up production. Last month, Nato secretary general Jens Stoltenberg urgently urged allies to step up production, as the Ukrainians were burning up munitions faster than the West was able to keep them supplied. The committee's warning echoes concerns expressed by Defence Secretary Ben Wallace, who has said that armed forces across Europe have been paying the price for years of "hollowing out". ![]() "This inability to replenish UK stockpiles, therefore, puts at risk not just our ability to resupply Ukraine but also to counter any threat to our own security." "Whilst Russia is also facing the diminution of its stockpiles, other adversaries are able to maintain and potentially increase their own. It said: "It is clear that the UK and its Nato allies have allowed ammunition stockpiles to dwindle to dangerously low levels. The committee said the way in which Western governments procure armaments is "not fit for purpose" and it urged the Ministry of Defence (MOD) to draw up an action plan to cut the time needed to restore its stockpiles.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |